Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Mar;80(3):884-907.
doi: 10.1111/jan.15865. Epub 2023 Sep 14.

Interprofessional clinical decision-making process in health: A scoping review

Affiliations
Review

Interprofessional clinical decision-making process in health: A scoping review

Tiphanie Bouchez et al. J Adv Nurs. 2024 Mar.

Abstract

Aims: To describe the key elements of the interprofessional decision-making process in health, based on published scientific studies. To describe the authors, reviews and subject matter of those publications.

Design: Scoping review of the literature.

Data sources: MEDLINE, APA Psycinfo OpenGrey, Lissa and Cochrane databases were searched in December 2019 and January 2023.

Review methods: References were considered eligible if they (i) were written in French or English, (ii) concerned health, (iii) studied a clinical decision-making process, (iv) were performed in an interprofessional context. 'PRISMA-scoping review' guidelines were respected. The eligible studies were analysed and classified by an inductive approach RESULTS: We identified 1429 sources of information, 145 of which were retained for the analysis. Based on these studies, we identified five key elements of interprofessional decision-making in health. The process was found to be influenced by group dynamics, the available information and consideration of the unique characteristics of the patient. An organizational framework and specific training favoured improvements in the process.

Conclusion: Decision-making can be based on a willingness of the healthcare organization to promote models based on more shared leadership and to work on professional roles and values. It also requires healthcare professionals trained in the entire continuum of collaborative practices, to meet the unique needs of each patient. Finally, it appears essential to favour the sharing of multiple sources of accessible and structured information. Tools for knowledge formalization should help to optimize interprofessional decision-making in health.

Impact: The quality of a team decision-making is critical to the quality of care. Interprofessional decision-making can be structured and improved through different levels of action. These improvements could benefit to patients and healthcare professionals in every settings of care involving care collaboration.

Impact statement: Interprofessional decision-making in health is an essential lever of quality of care, especially for the most complex patients which are a contemporary challenge. This scoping review article offers a synthesis of a large corpus of data published to date about the interprofessional clinical decision-making process in healthcare. It has the potential to provide a global vision, practical data and a list of references to facilitate the work of healthcare teams, organizations and teachers ready to initiate a change.

Keywords: decision-making; group process; interprofessional relations; literature review; nurses; patient care team; physicians; rehabilitation; scoping review; social workers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

REFERENCES

    1. Abramson, J. S., & Mizrahi, T. (2003). Understanding collaboration between social workers and physicians: Application of a typology. Social Work in Health Care, 37, 71-100. https://doi.org/10.1300/J010v37n02_04
    1. Ackerly, D. C., Sangvai, D. G., Udayakumar, K., Shah, B. R., Kalman, N. S., Cho, A. H., Schulman, K. A., Fulkerson, W. J., & Dzau, V. J. (2011). Training the next generation of physician-executives: An innovative residency pathway in management and leadership. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 86, 575-579. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e318212e51b
    1. Ambrose-Miller, W., & Ashcroft, R. (2016). Challenges faced by social workers as members of interprofessional collaborative health care teams. Health & Social Work, 41, 101-109. https://doi.org/10.1093/hsw/hlw006
    1. Andermo, S., Sundberg, T., Forsberg, C., & Falkenberg, T. (2015). Capitalizing on synergies-A discourse analysis of the process of collaboration among providers of integrative health care. PLoS One, 10, e0122125. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122125
    1. Anquinet, L., Rietjens, J. A., Mathers, N., Seymour, J., van der Heide, A., & Deliens, L. (2015). Descriptions by general practitioners and nurses of their collaboration in continuous sedation until death at home: In-depth qualitative interviews in three European countries. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 49(1), 98-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.05.012

LinkOut - more resources