Efficacy of interactive manual dexterity training after stroke: a pilot single-blinded randomized controlled trial - Archive ouverte HAL
Article Dans Une Revue Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation Année : 2023

Efficacy of interactive manual dexterity training after stroke: a pilot single-blinded randomized controlled trial

Résumé

Objective To compare the efficacy of Dextrain Manipulandum™ training of dexterity components such as force control and independent finger movements, to dose-matched conventional therapy (CT) post-stroke. Methods A prospective, single-blind, pilot randomized clinical trial was conducted. Chronic-phase post-stroke patients with mild-to-moderate dexterity impairment (Box and Block Test (BBT) > 1) received 12 sessions of Dextrain or CT. Blinded measures were obtained before and after training and at 3-months follow-up. Primary outcome was BBT-change (after–before training). Secondary outcomes included changes in motor impairments, activity limitations and dexterity components. Corticospinal excitability and short intracortical inhibition (SICI) were measured using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Results BBT-change after training did not differ between the Dextrain (N = 21) vs CT group (N = 21) (median [IQR] = 5[2–7] vs 4[2–7], respectively; P = 0.36). Gains in BBT were maintained at the 3-month post-training follow-up, with a non-significant trend for enhanced BBT-change in the Dextrain group (median [IQR] = 3[− 1–7.0], P = 0.06). Several secondary outcomes showed significantly larger changes in the Dextrain group: finger tracking precision (mean ± SD = 0.3 ± 0.3N vs − 0.1 ± 0.33N; P < 0.0018), independent finger movements (34.7 ± 25.1 ms vs 7.7 ± 18.5 ms, P = 0.02) and maximal finger tapping speed (8.4 ± 7.1 vs 4.5 ± 4.9, P = 0.045). At follow-up, Dextrain group showed significantly greater improvement in Motor Activity Log (median/IQR = 0.7/0.2–0.8 vs 0.2/0.1–0.6, P = 0.05). Across both groups SICI increased in patients with greater BBT-change (Rho = 0.80, P = 0.006). Comparing Dextrain subgroups with maximal grip force higher/lower than median (61.2%), BBT-change was significantly larger in patients with low vs high grip force (7.5 ± 5.6 vs 2.9 ± 2.8; respectively, P = 0.015). Conclusions Although immediate improvements in gross dexterity post-stroke did not significantly differ between Dextrain training and CT, our findings suggest that Dextrain enhances recovery of several dexterity components and reported hand-use, particularly when motor impairment is moderate (low initial grip force). Findings need to be confirmed in a larger trial. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03934073 (retrospectively registered)
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
s12984-023-01213-9.pdf (1.87 Mo) Télécharger le fichier
Origine Publication financée par une institution
Licence

Dates et versions

hal-04494677 , version 1 (07-03-2024)

Licence

Identifiants

Citer

Maxime Térémetz, Sonia Hamdoun, Florence Colle, Eloïse Gerardin, Claire Desvilles, et al.. Efficacy of interactive manual dexterity training after stroke: a pilot single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 2023, 20 (1), pp.93. ⟨10.1186/s12984-023-01213-9⟩. ⟨hal-04494677⟩
45 Consultations
27 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

More