Is ambidexterity a way of managing paradoxes? Lessons from a multiple-case study - Archive ouverte HAL
Communication Dans Un Congrès Année : 2015

Is ambidexterity a way of managing paradoxes? Lessons from a multiple-case study

Résumé

Paradoxes are progressively considered as a central form of organizational management. However, their management remains unclear. Dilemma (that consists of focusing on one element of the paradox) and compromise appear to be limited. This paper explores the idea that ambidexterity could be an innovative way of managing paradoxes. To show this, it presents three case studies that illustrate the limitations of dilemma and compromise and underline that ambidextries could be a way of managing paradoxes.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
GRIMAND et al. EGOS 2015.pdf (392.19 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)

Dates et versions

hal-04474481 , version 1 (23-02-2024)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : hal-04474481 , version 1

Citer

Amaury Grimand, Ewan Oiry, Aurélien Ragaigne. Is ambidexterity a way of managing paradoxes? Lessons from a multiple-case study. 31st EGOS ( European Group for Organizational Studies) Colloquium, ALBA Graduate Business School, Jul 2015, Athenes, Greece. ⟨hal-04474481⟩
30 Consultations
22 Téléchargements

Partager

More