Commentary on François Hell report - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Autre Publication Scientifique Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), eds L. Bently & M. Kretschmer, www.copyrighthistory.org Année : 2019

Commentary on François Hell report

Frédéric Rideau
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 1297637
  • IdRef : 060245883

Résumé

Following complaints from the book trade in 1790 and 1791, François Hell, deputy (of the National Assembly) for the Bas-Rhin, and member of the Committee on Agriculture and Commerce, was charged with elaborating a new “scientific” and literary property report and bill (“projet de décret”), a task which would also be submitted to the consultation of the Committee on the Constitution, before finally being lost. Although this proposal has eventually raised less attention than for the previous Sieyès attempt to regulate circulation of books (f_1790), it remains that it enshrined literary property in absolute terms which were also directly affiliated to the debates of the Ancien Régime, including, to some extent, the solutions adopted by the 1777 decrees (f_1777a). After exploring how such a radical projet made his way through the Committees, the commentary details how literary property, after being protected by book trade privileges, had now to be fully secured by the law, with a broad spectrum of protection for every kind of book, supposedly to the benefit for both the authors (and their assignees) and the general interest.
Fichier non déposé

Dates et versions

hal-04460002 , version 1 (15-02-2024)

Licence

Paternité - Pas d'utilisation commerciale - Pas de modification

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : hal-04460002 , version 1

Citer

Frédéric Rideau. Commentary on François Hell report. 2019, https://www.copyrighthistory.org/cam/tools/request/showRecord.php?id=commentary_f_1791a. ⟨hal-04460002⟩

Collections

UNIV-POITIERS IHD
8 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More