Comparison of the phase-field approach and cohesive element modeling to analyze the double cleavage drilled compression fracture test of an elastoplastic material - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue International Journal of Fracture Année : 2024

Comparison of the phase-field approach and cohesive element modeling to analyze the double cleavage drilled compression fracture test of an elastoplastic material

Comparaison de l'approche à champs de phase et des éléments cohésifs pour l'analyse de l'essai de fissuration de double clivage par compression pour un matériau élastoplastique

Résumé

Brittle material Mode I fracture may be characterized by the double cleavage drilled compres- sion test. For linear elastic materials, the critical energy release rate, or fracture toughness, can be estimated simply using the linear elastic fracture mechanics. For other types of constitutive behavior, the material parameter has to be determined with numerical fracture modeling. In this paper, we have used two approaches, the phase-field damage model and the cohesive ele- ments, in order to estimate the critical energy release rate of an elastoplastic material. Firstly, we assessed the numerical models and discussed their parameters by comparison of available data from double cleav- age drilled compression experimental tests run on a sil- ica glass. Both phase-field damage and cohesive zone models were able to reproduce fracture initiation at the observed macroscopic stress for the linear elastic mate- rial. However, the material toughness could not be pre- dicted by the phase-field approach due to the result dependence on the model regularization parameter. Secondly, an elastoplastic methyl methacrylate poly- mer was submitted to the compression test in our lab. Both models were then extended for elastic-perfectly plastic materials. Crack initiation was obtained at the observed macroscopic strain for similar critical energy release rate ranges for both approaches, providing good confidence in the estimated material toughness.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
HAL_version.pdf (3.56 Mo) Télécharger le fichier
Origine Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)

Dates et versions

hal-04412583 , version 1 (23-01-2024)

Identifiants

Citer

Arnaud Coq, Julie Diani, Stella Brach. Comparison of the phase-field approach and cohesive element modeling to analyze the double cleavage drilled compression fracture test of an elastoplastic material: Phase-field approach and cohesive elements for DCDC. International Journal of Fracture, 2024, ⟨10.1007/s10704-023-00755-2⟩. ⟨hal-04412583⟩
22 Consultations
70 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Mastodon Facebook X LinkedIn More