Comparison of pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in a retrospective full pregnancy history survey versus population-based prospective records: a validation study in rural Sarlahi District, Nepal - Archive ouverte HAL
Article Dans Une Revue Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition Année : 2023

Comparison of pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in a retrospective full pregnancy history survey versus population-based prospective records: a validation study in rural Sarlahi District, Nepal

Résumé

Countries without complete civil registration and vital statistics systems rely on retrospective full pregnancy history surveys (FPH) to estimate incidence of pregnancy and mortality outcomes, including stillbirth and neonatal death. Yet surveys are subject to biases that impact demographic estimates, and few studies have quantified these effects. We compare data from an FPH vs. prospective records from a population-based cohort to estimate validity for maternal recall of live births, stillbirths, and neonatal deaths in a rural population in Sarlahi District, Nepal.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
Erchick_etal_pregnancy-neonatal-outcomes_JHealth-Pop&Nutrition_42-139_2023.pdf (1.41 Mo) Télécharger le fichier
Origine Accord explicite pour ce dépôt

Dates et versions

hal-04351015 , version 1 (18-12-2023)

Licence

Identifiants

Citer

Daniel J. Erchick, Tsering P. Lama, Seema Subedi, Andrea Verhulst, Michel Guillot, et al.. Comparison of pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in a retrospective full pregnancy history survey versus population-based prospective records: a validation study in rural Sarlahi District, Nepal. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition, 2023, 42 (139), pp.1-13. ⟨10.1186/s41043-023-00472-5⟩. ⟨hal-04351015⟩
35 Consultations
16 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

More