In this paper we question the almost universal assumption that in neural networks each token should be represented by a single vector. In fact, it is so natural to use one vector per word that most people do not even consider it as an assumption of their various models. Via a series of experiments on dependency parsing, in which we let each token in a sentence be represented by a sequence of vectors, we show that the "one single vector per token" assumption might be too strong for recurrent neural networks. Indeed, biaffine parsers seem to work better when their encoder accesses its input's tokens' representations in several time steps rather than all at once. This seems to indicate that having only one occasion to look at a token through its vector is too strong a constraint for recurrent neural networks and calls for further studies on the way tokens are fed to neural networks.