Les effets des arrêts préjudiciels. Tentative d'élucidation d'une controverse stérile - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue Revue des Affaires européennes/Law European & Affairs Année : 2023

Les effets des arrêts préjudiciels. Tentative d'élucidation d'une controverse stérile

Résumé

The effects of preliminary rulings have long been a topic of interest and, at times, of controversy among EU legal scholars. This paper purports to prove that the effects of such rulings are not truly specific and defends the use of the well-established categories of res judicata and precedent in order to describe them. Res judicata, and the idea of its 'positive' effects developed for example in the French procedural system, applies to such rulings and provides perfectly well-suited tools to describe the effects they produce within the national proceedings which give rise to them. Conversely, the concept of precedent and the analytical tools constructed for stare decisis are pertinent to describe the normative impact such rulings may produce beyond the case at hand. Both types of effects are present in preliminary rulings as in other judgments of the EU Courts.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
Les effets des arrêts préjudiciels preprint.pdf (751.8 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)
Licence

Dates et versions

hal-04315310 , version 1 (30-11-2023)

Licence

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : hal-04315310 , version 1

Citer

Araceli Turmo. Les effets des arrêts préjudiciels. Tentative d'élucidation d'une controverse stérile. Revue des Affaires européennes/Law European & Affairs, 2023, 1, pp.65-79. ⟨hal-04315310⟩

Collections

CNRS DCS
18 Consultations
1 Téléchargements

Partager

Gmail Mastodon Facebook X LinkedIn More