Argumentation for Decision Making - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Chapitre D'ouvrage Année : 2009

Argumentation for Decision Making

Résumé

Decision making, often viewed as a form of reasoning toward action, has raised the interest of many scholars including economists, psychologists, and computer scientists for a long time. Any decision problem amounts to selecting the “best” or sufficiently “good” action(s) that are feasible among different alternatives, given some available information about the current state of the world and the consequences of potential actions. Available information may be incomplete or pervaded with uncertainty. Besides, the goodness of an action is judged by estimating how much its possible consequences fit the preferences of the decision maker. This agent is assumed to behave in a rational way [29] amgoud-woold, at least in the sense that his decisions should be as much as possible consistent with his preferences.
Fichier non déposé

Dates et versions

hal-04313451 , version 1 (29-11-2023)

Identifiants

Citer

Leila Amgoud. Argumentation for Decision Making. Simari, Guillermo; Rahwan, Iyad. Argumentation in AI, chapter 15, Springer, pp.301--320, 2009, 978-0-387-98196-3. ⟨10.1007/978-0-387-98197-0_15⟩. ⟨hal-04313451⟩
0 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More