Bad smells in reviewers' reports? Text-mining the MDPI Open Peer Review Corpus
Abstract
Malpractice affecting the reviewing process is detrimental to science. We introduce methods to reveal evidence of peer review manipulation, such as template usage, citation manipulations or botched and meaningless reviewer reports. We apply and evaluate these methods on a corpus of reports.
Domains
Digital Libraries [cs.DL]| Origin | Files produced by the author(s) |
|---|---|
| Licence |
