Morphological variability or inter‐observer bias? A methodological toolkit to improve data quality of multi‐researcher datasets for the analysis of morphological variation - Archive ouverte HAL
Article Dans Une Revue American Journal of Biological Anthropology Année : 2023

Morphological variability or inter‐observer bias? A methodological toolkit to improve data quality of multi‐researcher datasets for the analysis of morphological variation

Dominik Schüßler
Nicola K Guthrie
  • Fonction : Auteur
Gabriele M Sgarlata
  • Fonction : Auteur
Refaly Ernest
  • Fonction : Auteur
Alida Hasiniaina
  • Fonction : Auteur
Gillian Olivieri
  • Fonction : Auteur
Tantely Ralantoharijaona
  • Fonction : Auteur
Veronarindra Ramananjato
  • Fonction : Auteur
Nancia N Raoelinjanakolona
  • Fonction : Auteur
Emilienne Rasoazanabary
  • Fonction : Auteur
Sam Hyde Roberts
  • Fonction : Auteur
Steig E Johnson
  • Fonction : Auteur
Jörg U Ganzhorn
  • Fonction : Auteur
Lounès Chikhi
Peter M Kappeler
Edward E Louis
  • Fonction : Auteur
Jordi Salmona
  • Fonction : Auteur
Ute Radespiel

Résumé

Objectives: The investigation of morphological variation in animals is widely used in taxonomy, ecology, and evolution. Using large datasets for meta-analyses has dramatically increased, raising concerns about dataset compatibilities and biases introduced by contributions of multiple researchers. Materials and Methods: We compiled morphological data on 13 variables for 3073 individual mouse lemurs (Cheirogaleidae, Microcebus spp.) from 25 taxa and 153 different sampling locations, measured by 48 different researchers. We introduced and applied a filtering pipeline and quantified improvements in data quality (Shapiro-Francia statistic, skewness, and excess kurtosis). The filtered dataset was then used to test for genus-wide sexual size dimorphism and the applicability of Rensch's, Allen's, and Bergmann's rules. Results: Our pipeline reduced inter-observer bias (i.e., increased normality of data distributions). Inter-observer reliability of measurements was notably variable, highlighting the need to reduce data collection biases. Although subtle, we found a consistent pattern of sexual size dimorphism across Microcebus, with females being the larger (but not heavier) sex. Sexual size dimorphism was isometric, providing no support for Rensch's rule. Variations in tail length but not in ear size were consistent with the predictions of Allen's rule. Body mass and length followed a pattern contrary to predictions of Bergmann's rule. Discussion: We highlighted the usefulness of large multi-researcher datasets for testing ecological hypotheses after correcting for inter-observer biases. Using genus-wide tests, we outlined generalizable patterns of morphological variability across all mouse lemurs. This new methodological toolkit aims to facilitate future large-scale morphological comparisons for a wide range of taxa and applications.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
Microcebus_morphology_submission_20230216.pdf (2.8 Mo) Télécharger le fichier
Origine Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)
Licence
Domaine public

Dates et versions

hal-04300286 , version 1 (23-11-2023)

Licence

Domaine public

Identifiants

Citer

Dominik Schüßler, Marina B Blanco, Nicola K Guthrie, Gabriele M Sgarlata, Melanie Dammhahn, et al.. Morphological variability or inter‐observer bias? A methodological toolkit to improve data quality of multi‐researcher datasets for the analysis of morphological variation. American Journal of Biological Anthropology, In press, ⟨10.1002/ajpa.24836⟩. ⟨hal-04300286⟩
22 Consultations
60 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

More