Although several uncertainty quantification algorithms have gained widespread use in applications, recent work suggests that the resultant uncertainty estimates are inaccurate when the model order of the dynamic system is misspecified. In practice, the choice of the model order is either based on heuristics, or it relies on procedures assessing the fit of the identified model to data, disregarding the statistical information content in the obtained estimates. In this paper we go back to the roots of the uncertainty propagation in subspace methods and revise it to account for the erroneously chosen model order. The performance of the proposed approach is illustrated on real data collected from a full-scale wind turbine blade.