Tresca vs. von Mises: Which failure criterion is more conservative in a probabilistic context? - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue Journal of Applied Mechanics Année : 2023

Tresca vs. von Mises: Which failure criterion is more conservative in a probabilistic context?

Résumé

This tutorial examines the failure theories of Tresca and von Mises, both of which are crucial for designing metallic structures. Conventionally, Tresca is regarded as more conservative than von Mises from a deterministic perspective. This tutorial, however, introduces a different viewpoint, presenting a scenario where von Mises' theory may appear more conservative when variability in the mechanical system parameters is considered. This often overlooked aspect is not extensively addressed in standard textbooks on solid mechanics and the strength of materials. The tutorial aims to shed light on the non-negligible probability where von Mises' criterion yields a smaller equivalent stress than Tresca, thus being more conservative. It underscores the importance of integrating probabilistic considerations into stress analyses of solids, offering valuable insights for the education of structural mechanics.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
Tutorial_JAM2023.pdf (1010.88 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)
Licence : Copyright (Tous droits réservés)

Dates et versions

hal-04245274 , version 1 (17-10-2023)

Licence

Copyright (Tous droits réservés)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : hal-04245274 , version 1

Citer

Americo Cunha Jr, Yasar Yanik, Carlo Olivieri, Samuel da Silva. Tresca vs. von Mises: Which failure criterion is more conservative in a probabilistic context?. Journal of Applied Mechanics, In press. ⟨hal-04245274⟩
17 Consultations
681 Téléchargements

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More