[Sommaire : (-I- Metaphysics) Edwin CURLEY (« Spinoza’s Metaphysics Revisited »), Pierre-François MOREAU (« A Response: On Spinoza, Possible Worlds, and Pantheism ») ; Michael DELLA ROCCA (« The Elusiveness of the One and the Many in Spinoza : Substance, Attribute, and Mode »), Pascal sévérac (« A Response: In What Way It Exists ») ; Yitzhak Y. MELAMED (« The Earliest Draft of Spinoza’s Ethics »), Mogens LAERKE (« A Response: Accidents and Modifications : an Additional Note on Axioms 1 and 2 in Appendix of the Short Treatise ») ; Martin LIN (« Metaphysical Rationalism »), Valérie DEBUICHE (« A Response: Leibniz’s Principle of (Sufficient) Reason and Principle of Identity of Indiscernibles ») ; Simon B. DUFFY (« The Transformation of Relations in Spinoza’s Metaphysics »), Céline HERVET (« A Response: Essence, Variations in Power, and ‘Becoming Other’ in Spinoza ») ; (-II- Philosophy of Mind) Alison PETERMAN (« Spinoza’s Two Claims about the Mind-Body Relation »), Jack STETTER (« A Response: A Puzzle in Spinoza’s Views on the Mind-Body Problem ») ; Knox PEDEN (« Spinoza’s True Ideas: Suggestive Convergences »), Pascale GILLOT (« A Response: Althusser, Spinoza and the Specter of the Cartesian Subject ») ; Michael A. ROSENTHAL (« Spinoza on Beings of Reason [Entia Rationis] and the Analogical Imagination »), Jacqueline LAGRéE (« A Response: Analogia and Ens Rationis ») ; (-III- Moral philosophy) Steven NADLER (« Spinoza on Good and Bad »), Lorenzo VINCIGUERRA (« A Response: The Knowledge of Good and Bad ») ; Hasana SHARP (« Generosity as Freedom in Spinoza’s Ethics »), Ariel SUHAMY (« A Response: A Generous Reading ») ; (-IV- Political Philosophy) Daniel GARBER (« Obedience in Spinoza’s Tractatus Theologico-Politicus »), Chantal JAQUET (« A Response: Logic of the Superstitious, Logic of the Pious ») ; Steven BARBONE (« Individual and Community and its American Legacy »), Laurent BOVE (« A Response: Between Matheron and Spinoza, Something Happens… »), Jonathan ISRAEL (« Spinoza’s Formulation of the Radical Enlightenment’s Two Fundational Concepts: How Much Did He Owe to the Dutch Golden Age ? »), Charles RAMOND (« A Response: Spinoza’s Paradoxical Radicalism »).]