Critical comments on the article by Wang et al. "Lectotypification of the name Brachyscome neocaledonica = Pytinicarpa neocaledonica (Asteraceae: Astereae)" published in the Ukrainian Botanical Journal (2022, 79(2): 77–83) - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue Ukrainian Botanical Journal Année : 2022

Critical comments on the article by Wang et al. "Lectotypification of the name Brachyscome neocaledonica = Pytinicarpa neocaledonica (Asteraceae: Astereae)" published in the Ukrainian Botanical Journal (2022, 79(2): 77–83)

Résumé

In this note, we highlight a series of possible misinterpretations (collectors, localities, previous writings) and other problems in the nomenclatural study by Wang et al. (2022) on lectotypification of the name Brachyscome neocaledonica ≡ Pytinicarpa neocaledonica (Asteraceae: Astereae). In our opinion, this lectotype designation led to debatable conclusions that added confusion to taxonomy of Pytinicarpa G.L.Nesom, an already taxonomically complicated genus. However, we accept that type designation and explain its nomenclatural and taxonomic consequences.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
ukrbotj-2022-79-5-271.pdf (2.25 Mo) Télécharger le fichier
Origine Fichiers éditeurs autorisés sur une archive ouverte

Dates et versions

hal-04183232 , version 1 (18-08-2023)

Licence

Identifiants

Citer

Guillaume Lannuzel, Marc Pignal, Gildas Gâteblé. Critical comments on the article by Wang et al. "Lectotypification of the name Brachyscome neocaledonica = Pytinicarpa neocaledonica (Asteraceae: Astereae)" published in the Ukrainian Botanical Journal (2022, 79(2): 77–83). Ukrainian Botanical Journal, 2022, 79 (5), pp.271-276. ⟨10.15407/ukrbotj79.05.271⟩. ⟨hal-04183232⟩
43 Consultations
4 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Mastodon Facebook X LinkedIn More