Visual preference for kinetic patterns in infancy and adulthood: evidence for an aesthetic of motion
Résumé
Adults (n = 28) were instucted to choose their preferred motion in different pairing. 56 randomized pairs were presented for 5 seconds side-by-side. The aesthetic value of each stimulus was calculated with Elo rating. Data were collected using Matlab 8.2. STIMULI RATING Intercept β0 = 6.09e+1, t(203) = 51.01, p < .001, ŋ²p = .61 Elo score β1 = 1.51e+0, t(200) = 11.95, p < .001, ŋ²p = .08 Age (in days) β2 = 3.86e-0, t(200) = 11.92, p < .001, ŋ²p = .08 Elo ranking x Age β3 = 9.30e-1, t(200) = 2.72, p < .01, ŋ²p = .01 We used Zeki and Stutters' (2012) kinetic patterns. The patterns were initially designed to produce different aesthetic judgment.
Domaines
| Origine | Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s) |
|---|---|
| Licence |