Climate Change Litigation and Legitimacy of Judges towards a « wicked problem »: Empowerement, discretion and prudence - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Chapitre D'ouvrage Année : 2023

Climate Change Litigation and Legitimacy of Judges towards a « wicked problem »: Empowerement, discretion and prudence

Contentieux climatiques et légitimité des juges envers un "wicked problèm": capacité, discrétion et prudence

Résumé

For the past ten years climate litigation has received growing attention from academics, lawyers and civil society. Although the first climate trials emerged twenty years ago, they have recently increased and constitute nowadays a new trend in international, administrative and civil law. While climate litigation has acquired interest as a relatively new procedural and judicial phenomenon, the contribution that judges make to the construction and implementation of ecological transition in the context of the climate crisis has become an object of studies in itself. This article belongs to the latter category of studies in that it explores the role of the judge in the context of climate litigation and presents both its possibilities and limits, while also highlighting the progress that has been made in this area.
Fichier sous embargo
Fichier sous embargo
1 0 1
Année Mois Jours
Avant la publication
mardi 29 avril 2025
Fichier sous embargo
mardi 29 avril 2025
Connectez-vous pour demander l'accès au fichier

Dates et versions

hal-04085714 , version 1 (08-12-2023)

Licence

Copyright (Tous droits réservés)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : hal-04085714 , version 1

Citer

Marta Torre-Schaub. Climate Change Litigation and Legitimacy of Judges towards a « wicked problem »: Empowerement, discretion and prudence. Chair of French Public Law. Climate Change law and Policy French Yearbook of Public Law, 1 (1), LFOER, In press, French Public Law Yearbook. ⟨hal-04085714⟩
89 Consultations
3 Téléchargements

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More