Some syntactic approaches to the handling of inconsistent knowledge bases: A comparative study − Part 1: The flat case - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue Studia Logica Année : 1997

Some syntactic approaches to the handling of inconsistent knowledge bases: A comparative study − Part 1: The flat case

Résumé

This paper presents and discusses several methods for reasoning from inconsistent knowledge bases. A so-called argued consequence relation, taking into account the existence of consistent arguments in favour of a conclusion and the absence of consistent arguments in favour of its contrary, is particularly investigated. Flat knowledge bases, i.e., without any priority between their elements, are studied under different inconsistency-tolerant consequence relations, namely the so-called argumentative, free, universal, existential, cardinality-based, and paraconsistent consequence relations. The syntax-sensitivity of these consequence relations is studied. A companion paper is devoted to the case where priorities exist between the pieces of information in the knowledge base.

Dates et versions

hal-04034565 , version 1 (17-03-2023)

Identifiants

Citer

Salem Benferhat, Didier Dubois, Henri Prade. Some syntactic approaches to the handling of inconsistent knowledge bases: A comparative study − Part 1: The flat case. Studia Logica, 1997, 58 (1), pp.17--45. ⟨10.1023/A:1004987830832⟩. ⟨hal-04034565⟩
5 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More