Fragment of the necessary decisions explained by an argument scheme in a non compensatory sorting model - Archive ouverte HAL Access content directly
Conference Papers Year : 2022

Fragment of the necessary decisions explained by an argument scheme in a non compensatory sorting model

Khaled Belahcene
Jérome Gaigne
  • Function : Author
  • PersonId : 1201041

Abstract

We focus on an argument scheme explaining a necessary decision with respect to a jurisprudence considering the non compensatory sorting model. In this model, a set of candidates is sorted in two ordered categories by a set of points of view expressing an individual preference over the set of candidates. Candidates are ranked in the upper category if they are accepted by a sufficient subset of points of view. We show that the argument scheme is an approximation of this model and share some counterintuitive results concerning the relative performance of some well-known solvers.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
DA2PL_paper_9261.pdf (401.47 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origin : Files produced by the author(s)

Dates and versions

hal-03897196 , version 1 (13-12-2022)

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : hal-03897196 , version 1

Cite

Khaled Belahcene, Jérome Gaigne, Sylvain Lagrue. Fragment of the necessary decisions explained by an argument scheme in a non compensatory sorting model. From Multiple-Criteria Decision Aid to Preference Learning (DA2PL 2022), Nov 2022, Compiègne, France. ⟨hal-03897196⟩
13 View
3 Download

Share

Gmail Facebook Twitter LinkedIn More