%0 Journal Article %T Updated constraints from the effective field theory analysis of BOSS power spectrum on Early Dark Energy %+ Laboratoire Univers et Particules de Montpellier (LUPM) %A Simon, Théo %A Zhang, Pierre %A Poulin, Vivian %A Smith, Tristan L. %< avec comité de lecture %J Phys.Rev.D %V 107 %N 6 %P 063505 %8 2023 %D 2023 %Z 2208.05930 %R 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.063505 %K tension %K satellite: Planck %K power spectrum %K effective field theory %K dark energy %K resolution %K cosmological model: parameter space %K redshift %K supernova: Type I %K calibration %K fractional %K structure %K loop integral %K Hubble constant %K baryon: oscillation: acoustic %K data analysis method %K confidence limit %Z Physics [physics]/Astrophysics [astro-ph] %Z Physics [physics]/High Energy Physics - Phenomenology [hep-ph] %Z Physics [physics]/High Energy Physics - Theory [hep-th]Journal articles %X Analyses of the full shape of BOSS DR12 power spectrum using the one-loop prediction from the Effective Field Theory of Large-Scale Structure (EFTBOSS) have led to new constraints on extensions to the $\Lambda$CDM model, such as Early Dark Energy (EDE) which has been suggested as a resolution to the "Hubble tension". In this paper, we re-assess the constraining power of the EFTBOSS on EDE in light of a correction to the normalization of BOSS window functions. Overall we find that constraints from EFTBOSS on EDE are weakened, and represent a small change compared to constraints from Planck and the conventional BAO/$f\sigma_8$ measurements. The combination of Planck data with EFTBOSS provides a bound on the maximal fractional contribution of EDE $f_{\rm EDE}<0.083$ at 95% C.L. (compared to $<0.054$ with the incorrect normalization, and $<0.088$ without full-shape data) and the Hubble tension is reduced to $2.1\sigma$. However, the more extreme model favored by an analysis with just data from the Atacama Cosmology Telescope is disfavored by the EFTBOSS data. We also show that the updated Pantheon+ Type Ia supernova analysis can slightly increase the constraints on EDE. Yet, the inclusion of the SN1a magnitude calibration by SH0ES strongly increases the preference for EDE to above $5\sigma$, yielding $f_{\rm EDE}\sim 0.12^{+0.03}_{-0.02}$ around the redshift $z_c=4365^{+3000}_{-1100}$. Our results demonstrate that EFTBOSS data (alone or combined with Planck data) do not exclude the EDE resolution of the Hubble tension. %G English %L hal-03764337 %U https://hal.science/hal-03764337 %~ IN2P3 %~ CNRS %~ LUPM %~ UNIV-MONTPELLIER %~ LUPM_IFAC %~ UM-2015-2021 %~ UM-EPE