Prescribed argumentation, actual argumentation, reported argumentation. The management of argumentation in a public debate in France - Archive ouverte HAL
Article Dans Une Revue Journal of Argumentation in Context Année : 2022

Prescribed argumentation, actual argumentation, reported argumentation. The management of argumentation in a public debate in France

Marianne Doury
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 1151830
  • IdRef : 057376042
Ilaria Casillo
  • Fonction : Auteur

Résumé

This article starts from the observation that, in order to ensure their legitimacy, the modes of governance in place in most Western democracies make more room for citizen participation in decision-making processes. The result is the implementation of various participatory mechanisms, many of which seek to stimulate a citizen's argumentative expression. Based on a case study (the public debate on a gold mine project in French Guiana), we observe the norms that govern such participation processes and their implementation in the argumentative exchanges.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
Casillo_Doury_Prescribed argumentation, actual argumentation, reported argumentation.pdf (234.08 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)

Dates et versions

hal-03737314 , version 1 (24-07-2022)

Identifiants

Citer

Marianne Doury, Ilaria Casillo. Prescribed argumentation, actual argumentation, reported argumentation. The management of argumentation in a public debate in France. Journal of Argumentation in Context, 2022, 11 (1), ⟨10.1075/jaic.21021.dou⟩. ⟨hal-03737314⟩
56 Consultations
85 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

More