Why is economics not part of a system of scientific ethics? A review essay on Wilfred Dolfsma and Ioana Negru’s The Ethical Formation of Economists - Archive ouverte HAL
Article Dans Une Revue Journal of Philosophical Economics Année : 2020

Why is economics not part of a system of scientific ethics? A review essay on Wilfred Dolfsma and Ioana Negru’s The Ethical Formation of Economists

Résumé

Until the 1990s, the most used research and teaching materials for economists were print journal articles and print books. Since the Internet was commercialized in the 1990s, economists have used digital technologies in research and teaching. Journal articles and books are now more easily accessed. Online subscription systems allow economists to acquire electronic study and research materials in real time. Researchers can access a wealth of teaching and research materials freely and openly. In this essay [1], I focus on Wilfred Dolfsma and Ioana Negru’s The Ethical Formation of Economists (Dolfsma and Negru 2019) and claim that digital economics research requires a global understanding of ethics consistent with the values of scholarly practices. In the absence of scientific ethics, digital tools and software can harm the members of scholarly communities internationally and become a source of scientific misconduct. Economics should be taught as part of a system of scientific ethics.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
9017.pdf (243.69 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine Accord explicite pour ce dépôt

Dates et versions

hal-03711060 , version 1 (01-07-2022)

Licence

Identifiants

Citer

Altug Yalcintas. Why is economics not part of a system of scientific ethics? A review essay on Wilfred Dolfsma and Ioana Negru’s The Ethical Formation of Economists. Journal of Philosophical Economics, 2020, Volume XIII Issue 2 (2), pp.202-214. ⟨10.46298/jpe.10742⟩. ⟨hal-03711060⟩
53 Consultations
445 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

More