Four MPC implementations compared on the Quadruple Tank Process Benchmark: pros and cons of neural MPC - Archive ouverte HAL Access content directly
Journal Articles IFAC-PapersOnLine Year : 2022

Four MPC implementations compared on the Quadruple Tank Process Benchmark: pros and cons of neural MPC

Abstract

This study aims to aid understanding of Model Predictive Control (MPC) alternatives through comparing most interesting MPC implementations. This comparison will be performed intrinsically and illustrated using the four-tank benchmark, widely studied by academics taking care of industrial perspectives. Although MPC provides advanced control solutions for a wide class of dynamical systems, challenges arise in managing the compromise between accuracy, computational cost and resilience, depending on the type of model used. In this study, linear, linear time-varying and non-linear MPCs are compared to MPC that uses a neural network based predictive model identified from data. The tuning and implementation methods considered are discussed, and accurate simulation results provided and analyzed. Precisely, the performance of each method (linear, linear time-varying, non-linear MPC) are compared to the neural MPC. Pros and cons of neural MPC are highlighted.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
1-s2.0-S2405896322012241-main.pdf (875.23 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origin : Publisher files allowed on an open archive

Dates and versions

hal-03631171 , version 1 (28-09-2022)

Licence

Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivatives

Identifiers

Cite

Pierre Clément Blaud, Philippe Chevrel, Fabien Claveau, Pierrick Haurant, Anthony Mouraud. Four MPC implementations compared on the Quadruple Tank Process Benchmark: pros and cons of neural MPC. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2022, IFAC-PapersOnLine, 55 (16), pp.344-349. ⟨10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.09.048⟩. ⟨hal-03631171⟩
109 View
28 Download

Altmetric

Share

Gmail Facebook Twitter LinkedIn More