Source or target first? Comparison of two post-editing strategies with translation students - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue Journal of Data Mining and Digital Humanities Année : 2022

Source or target first? Comparison of two post-editing strategies with translation students

Résumé

We conducted an experiment with translation students to assess the influence of two different post-editing (PE) strategies (reading the source segment or the target segment first) on three aspects: PE time, ratio of corrected errors and number of optional modifications per word. Our results showed that the strategy that is adopted has no influence on the PE time or ratio of corrected errors. However, it does have an influence on the number of optional modifications per word. Two other thought-provoking observations emerged from this study: first, the ratio of corrected errors showed that, on average, students correct only half of the MT errors, which underlines the need for PE practice. Second, the time logs of the experiment showed that when students are not forced to read the source segment first, they tend to neglect the source segment and almost do monolingual PE. This experiment provides new insight relevant to PE teaching as well as the designing of PE environments.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
5.Volkart_9936_Vfinale.pdf (309.1 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)

Dates et versions

hal-03546151 , version 1 (08-02-2022)
hal-03546151 , version 2 (27-10-2022)
hal-03546151 , version 3 (12-12-2022)

Identifiants

Citer

Lise Volkart, Sabrina Girletti, Johanna Gerlach, Jonathan David Mutal, Pierrette Bouillon. Source or target first? Comparison of two post-editing strategies with translation students. Journal of Data Mining and Digital Humanities, 2022, Towards robotic translation?, ⟨10.46298/jdmdh.9067⟩. ⟨hal-03546151v3⟩
344 Consultations
502 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More