Assessing the Impact of Agents in Weighted Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Communication Dans Un Congrès Année : 2021

Assessing the Impact of Agents in Weighted Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks

Résumé

Argumentation provides a formalism consisting of arguments and attacks/supports between these arguments and can be used to rank or deduce justified conclusions. In multi-agent settings, where several agents can advance arguments at the same time, understanding which agent has the most influence on a particular argument can improve an agent's decision about which argument to advance next. In this paper, we introduce an argumentation framework with authorship and define new semantics to account for the impact of the agents on the arguments. We propose a set of desirable principles that such a semantics should satisfy, instantiate such semantics from two popular graded based semantics, and study to which extent these principles are satisfied. These semantics will allow an observer to identify the most influential agents in a debate.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
Agent_ranking.pdf (457.49 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)

Dates et versions

hal-03351536 , version 1 (22-09-2021)

Identifiants

Citer

Areski Himeur, Bruno Yun, Pierre Bisquert, Madalina Croitoru. Assessing the Impact of Agents in Weighted Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks. AI 2021 - 41st BCS SGAI International Conference on Innovative Techniques and Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Dec 2021, Cambridge (virtual), United Kingdom. pp.75-88, ⟨10.1007/978-3-030-91100-3_6⟩. ⟨hal-03351536⟩
165 Consultations
66 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More