Assessing the intelligibility of speech-disordered individuals generally involves asking them to read aloud texts such as word lists, a procedure that can be time-consuming if the materials are lengthy. This paper seeks to optimize such elicitation materials by identifying an optimal trade-off between the quantity of material needed for assessment purposes and its capacity to elicit a robust intelligibility metrics. More specifically, it investigates the effect of reducing the number of pseudowords used in a phonetic-acoustic decoding task in a speech-impaired population in terms of the subsequent impact on the intelligibility classifier as quantified by accuracy indexes (AUC of ROC, Balanced Accuracy index and F-scores). A comparison of obtained accuracy indexes shows that when reduction of the amount of elicitation material is based on a phonetic criterion—here, related to phonotactic complexity—the classifier has a higher classifying ability than when the material is arbitrarily reduced. Crucially, downsizing the material to about 30%of the original dataset does not diminish the classifier’s performance nor affect its stability. This result is of significant interest to clinicians as well as patients since it validates a tool that is both reliable and efficient.