A Decision-Theoretic Approach to Understanding Survey Response: Likert vs. Quadratic Voting for Attitudinal Research - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue University of Chicago Law Review Année : 2019

A Decision-Theoretic Approach to Understanding Survey Response: Likert vs. Quadratic Voting for Attitudinal Research

Résumé

"Likert scales" are the most standard and widespread instrument in survey research when measuring public opinion on political and economic issues. In this simple approach, respondents are given the opportunity to voice their agreement or disagreement on a set of issues by placing their attitudes on a scale that runs from ìstrongly disagreeîto ìstrongly agree.î One assumption commonly made by social scientists using such scales is that they provide faithful - if noisy - measures of respondentsíviews. We challenge this assumption, highlighting several reasons why respondents may be expected to sysmatically exaggerate their views in political surveys using Likert scales. We propose a simple decision-theoretic model of survey answers to discuss whether Quadratic Voting might overcome these pathologies. We provide conditions under which one might expect Quadratic Voting to outperform Likert scales.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
chen_32665.pdf (879.9 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine Accord explicite pour ce dépôt

Dates et versions

hal-03162149 , version 1 (15-03-2021)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : hal-03162149 , version 1

Citer

Charlotte Cavaillé, Daniel L. Chen, Karine van Der Straeten. A Decision-Theoretic Approach to Understanding Survey Response: Likert vs. Quadratic Voting for Attitudinal Research. University of Chicago Law Review, 2019, 87, pp.22-43. ⟨hal-03162149⟩
85 Consultations
44 Téléchargements

Partager

Gmail Mastodon Facebook X LinkedIn More