Soil bioengineering for riverbank stabilization involves the use of living plant materials to treat unstable or eroding riverbanks. These near-natural structures may harbor a higher plant richness and vegetation cover compared to classical civil engineering structures such as ripraps, but little information exists on vegetation dynamics during secondary succession on stabilized riverbanks. We hypothesized that soil bioengineering, by means of active introduction of early successional Salix shrubs, can foster successional trajectories of riparian plant communities, unlike civil engineering. We sampled three types of riverbank stabilization structures: pure bioengineering structures, mixed structures (combining riprap and bioengineering techniques) and ripraps, across a 14-year sequence on 42 sites located along 23 different streams running through the foothills of the Alps and the Jura Mountains (France and Switzerland). We quantified species richness and density and compared the temporal patterns of four groups of species that normally appear sequentially in natural succession on riverbanks (ruderal, hygrophilous, shade-tolerant, competitive species), as well as non-native species. Plant community composition differed greatly between ripraps and the two types of bioengineered sites, and ligneous species typical of advanced successional stages (Cornus sanguinea, Corylus avellana) spontaneously established in the oldest bioengineered sites. In general, richness of total species was higher in stabilization structures using soil bioengineering (including mixed structures) than in riprapped sites. In particular, the number of shade-tolerant and competitive species in bioengineered sites was double that found at ripraps after 14 years. Yet, richness of shade-tolerant species increased over time only on purely bioengineered sites, and their density there was almost twice that in mixed structures. Neither the type of stabilization structure nor time explained the variability in richness and density of non-native species across sites. Our study showed that along streams running through foothills, where erosion processes are usually intense, vegetation of bioengineered riverbanks exhibits successional dynamics similar to those theoretically found in natural conditions. Bioengineering can therefore foster ecological processes while stabilizing eroding riverbanks along foothill streams, thus satisfying human needs for infrastructure protection with less impact on the riparian ecosystem than riprap structures.