Implementation of international human rights decisions in France - Archive ouverte HAL
Chapitre D'ouvrage Année : 2019

Implementation of international human rights decisions in France

Résumé

This book attempts to establish how courts of general jurisdiction differ from specialized human rights courts in their approach to the implementation and development of international human rights. Why do courts of general jurisdiction face particular problems in relation to the application of international human rights law and why, in other cases, are they better placed than specialized human rights courts to act as guardians of international human rights? At the international level, this volume focusses on the International Court of Justice and courts of regional economic integration organizations in Europe, Latin America and Africa. With regard to the judicial implementation of international human rights and human rights decisions at the domestic level, the contributions analyze the requirements set by human rights treaties and offer a series of country studies on the practice of domestic courts in Europe, the Americas, Africa and Asia. This book follows up on research undertaken by the International Human Rights Law Committee of the International Law Association. It includes the final Committee report as well as contributions by committee members and external experts.

Domaines

Droit
Fichier non déposé

Dates et versions

hal-02952476 , version 1 (29-09-2020)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : hal-02952476 , version 1

Citer

Saïda El Boudouhi, Gesa Dannenberg. Implementation of international human rights decisions in France. Stefan Kadelbach; Thilo Rensmann; E R Rieter. Judging international human rights : courts of general jurisdiction as human rights courts, Springer, pp.453-470, 2019, 978-3-319-94847-8. ⟨hal-02952476⟩
56 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Partager

More