Conference Papers Year : 2017

Measuring Disagreement in Argumentation Graphs

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to evaluate to what extent an argumentation graph (a set of arguments and attacks between them) is conflicting. For that purpose , we introduce the novel notion of disagreement measure as well as a set of principles that such a measure should satisfy. We propose some intuitive measures and show that they fail to satisfy some of the principles. Then, we come up with a more discriminating measure which satisfies them all. Finally, we relate some measures to those quantifying inconsistency in knowledge bases.

Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
Measures.pdf (130.97 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origin Files produced by the author(s)
Licence
Loading...

Dates and versions

hal-02326011 , version 1 (22-10-2019)

Licence

Identifiers

Cite

Leila Amgoud, Jonathan Ben-Naim. Measuring Disagreement in Argumentation Graphs. 11th International Conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management (SUM 2017), Oct 2017, Grenade, Spain. ⟨10.1007/978-3-319-67582-4_15⟩. ⟨hal-02326011⟩
251 View
261 Download

Altmetric

Share

  • More