Systematic error and comparison of four methods for assessing the viability ofSaccharomyces cerevisiae suspensions - Archive ouverte HAL Access content directly
Journal Articles Biotechnology Techniques Year : 1993

Systematic error and comparison of four methods for assessing the viability ofSaccharomyces cerevisiae suspensions

Abstract

Four methods for the determination of cell viability were compared: the plate count technique, the flow cytometer, and two microscopic numerations- one after methylene blue staining and the other one with epifluorescence. The experimental error of these techniques was for the first time estimated: 8% for both numerations under microscope and 13% for the plate count technique. The staining mechanisms were explained by comparing the numerations under microscope and the flow cytometer analysis.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
Lange_22863.pdf (350.81 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origin : Files produced by the author(s)
Loading...

Dates and versions

hal-02143221 , version 1 (29-05-2019)

Identifiers

Cite

Hélène Lange, Jean-Michel Bavouzet, Patricia Taillandier, C. Delorme. Systematic error and comparison of four methods for assessing the viability ofSaccharomyces cerevisiae suspensions. Biotechnology Techniques, 1993, 7 (3), pp.223-228. ⟨10.1007/BF02566152⟩. ⟨hal-02143221⟩
21 View
57 Download

Altmetric

Share

Gmail Facebook Twitter LinkedIn More