Concept This paper is a living review on automatic program repair 1. Compared to a traditional survey, a living review evolves over time. I use a concise bullet-list style meant to be easily accessible by the greatest number of readers, in particular students and practitioners. Within a section, all papers are ordered in a reverse chronological order, so as to easily get the research timeline. The references are sorted chronologically and years are explicitly stated inline to easily grasp the most recent references. Inclusion criteria The inclusion criteria are that the considered papers 1) must be about automatic repair with some kind of patch generation (runtime repair without patch generation is excluded 2); 2) must contain a reasonable amount of material (at least 4 double-column pages); 3) are stored on an durable site (notable publisher, arXiv, Zenodo). There is no restriction about whether the paper has been formally peer-reviewed or not. Originality Compared to formal surveys [132, 125], this living review contains very recent references and continues to evolve. It uses a bullet-list concise style that is not typical academic writing. Notification To get notified with new versions, click here. Feedback Do not hesitate to report a mistake, a confusing statement or a missing paper,