Diagnostic value and relative weight of sequence-specific magnetic resonance features in characterizing clinically significant prostate cancers - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue PLoS ONE Année : 2017

Diagnostic value and relative weight of sequence-specific magnetic resonance features in characterizing clinically significant prostate cancers

Résumé

Purpose: To assess the diagnostic weight of sequence-specific magnetic resonance features in characterizing clinically significant prostate cancers (csPCa). Materials and methods: We used a prospective database of 262 patients who underwent T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted, and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging before prostatectomy. For each lesion, two independent readers (R1, R2) prospectively defined nine features: shape, volume (V_Max), signal abnormality on each pulse sequence, number of pulse sequences with a marked (S_Max) and non-visible (S_Min) abnormality, likelihood of extracapsular extension (ECE) and PSA density (dPSA). Overall likelihood of malignancy was assessed using a 5-level Likert score. Features were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). csPCa was defined as Gleason ≥7 cancer (csPCa-A), Gleason ≥7(4+3) cancer (csPCa-B) or Gleason ≥7 cancer with histological extraprostatic extension (csPCa-C), Results: For csPCa-A, the Signal1 model (S_Max+S_Min) provided the best combination of signal-related variables, for both readers. The performance was improved by adding V_Max, ECE and/or dPSA, but not shape. All models performed better with DCE findings than without. When moving from csPCa-A to csPCa-B and csPCa-C definitions, the added value of V_Max, dPSA and ECE increased as compared to signal-related variables, and the added value of DCE decreased. For R1, the best models were Signal1+ECE+dPSA (AUC = 0,805 [95%CI:0,757–0,866]), Signal1+V_Max+dPSA (AUC = 0.823 [95%CI:0.760–0.893]) and Signal1+ECE+dPSA [AUC = 0.840 (95%CI:0.774–0.907)] for csPCa-A, csPCA-B and csPCA-C respectively. The AUCs of the corresponding Likert scores were 0.844 [95%CI:0.806–0.877, p = 0.11], 0.841 [95%CI:0.799–0.876, p = 0.52]) and 0.849 [95%CI:0.811–0.884, p = 0.49], respectively. For R2, the best models were Signal1+V_Max+dPSA (AUC = 0,790 [95%CI:0,731–0,857]), Signal1+V_Max (AUC = 0.813 [95%CI:0.746–0.882]) and Signal1+ECE+V_Max (AUC = 0.843 [95%CI: 0.781–0.907]) for csPCa-A, csPCA-B and csPCA-C respectively. The AUCs of the corresponding Likert scores were 0. 829 [95%CI:0.791–0.868, p = 0.13], 0.790 [95%CI:0.742–0.841, p = 0.12]) and 0.808 [95%CI:0.764–0.845, p = 0.006]), respectively. Conclusion: Combination of simple variables can match the Likert score’s results. The optimal combination depends on the definition of csPCa.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
99b1fee43a3116422c106c2b25e1887c.pdf (1.38 Mo) Télécharger le fichier
Origine Fichiers éditeurs autorisés sur une archive ouverte

Dates et versions

hal-01943798 , version 1 (21-06-2024)

Identifiants

Citer

Olivier Rouvière, Tristan Dagonneau, F. Cros, F. Bratan, Laurent Roche, et al.. Diagnostic value and relative weight of sequence-specific magnetic resonance features in characterizing clinically significant prostate cancers. PLoS ONE, 2017, 12 (6), pp.e0178901. ⟨10.1371/journal.pone.0178901⟩. ⟨hal-01943798⟩
24 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Mastodon Facebook X LinkedIn More