Conflicts Versus Analytical Redundancy Relations - Archive ouverte HAL
Article Dans Une Revue IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics Année : 2004

Conflicts Versus Analytical Redundancy Relations

Résumé

Two distinct and parallel research communities have been working along the lines of the ModelBased Diagnosis approach: the FDI community and the DX community that have evolved in the fields of Automatic Control and Artificial Intelligence, respectively. This paper, which details and extends (Cordier et al., 2000a, 2000b), clarifies and links the concepts and assumptions that underlie the FDI analytical redundancy approach and the DX logical approach. The formal match of the two approaches is proved and the theoretical proof of their equivalence together with the necessary and sufficient conditions is provided. This work results from the collaboration existing within the French IMALAIA group supported by the French National Programs on Automatic Control GDR-Automatique and on Artificial Intelligence GDR-I3, and AFIA.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
conflicts-versus-analytical-redundancy-relations.pdf (194.38 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)

Dates et versions

hal-01931749 , version 1 (26-05-2021)

Identifiants

Citer

Marie-Odile Cordier, Philippe Dague, François Lévy, Jacky Montmain, Marcel Staroswiecki, et al.. Conflicts Versus Analytical Redundancy Relations. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics, 2004, 34 (5), pp.2163 - 2177. ⟨10.1109/TSMCB.2004.835010⟩. ⟨hal-01931749⟩
405 Consultations
329 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

More