Assessment of four different cardiac softwares for evaluation of LVEF with CZT-SPECT vs CMR in 48 patients with recent STEMI - Archive ouverte HAL Access content directly
Journal Articles Journal of Nuclear Cardiology Year : 2018

Assessment of four different cardiac softwares for evaluation of LVEF with CZT-SPECT vs CMR in 48 patients with recent STEMI

Antoine Plateau
  • Function : Author
Clément Bouvet
  • Function : Author
Charles Merlin
  • Function : Author
Bertrand Barres
  • Function : Author
Guillaume Clerfond
Lucie Cassagnes

Abstract

To compare, vs CMR, four softwares: quantitative gated SPECT (QGS), myometrix (MX), corridor 4DM (4DM), and Emory toolbox (ECTb) to evaluate left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), end-systolic (ESV), and end-diastolic volumes (EDVs) by gated MPI CZT-SPECT.
LVEF: LCC QGS/CMR = 0.81 [+ 2.2% (± 18%)], LCC MX/CMR = 0.83 [+ 1% (± 17.5%)], LCC 4DM/CMR = 0.73 [+ 3.9% (± 21%)], LCC ECTb/CMR = 0.69 [+ 6.6% (± 21.1%)]. ESV: LCC QGS/CMR = 0.90 [- 8 mL (± 40 mL)], LCC MX/CMR = 0.90 [- 9 mL (± 36 mL)], LCC 4DM/CMR = 0.89 [+ 4 mL (± 45 mL)], LCC ECTb/CMR = 0.87 [- 3 mL (± 45 mL)]. EDV: LCC QGS/CMR = 0.70 [- 16 mL (± 67 mL)], LCC MX/CMR = 0.68 [- 21 mL (± 63 mL], LCC 4DM/CMR = 0.72 [+ 9 mL (± 73 mL)], LCC ECTb/CMR = 0.69 [+ 10 mL (± 70 mL)].
No file

Dates and versions

hal-01926769 , version 1 (19-11-2018)

Identifiers

Cite

Antoine Plateau, Clément Bouvet, Charles Merlin, Bruno Pereira, Bertrand Barres, et al.. Assessment of four different cardiac softwares for evaluation of LVEF with CZT-SPECT vs CMR in 48 patients with recent STEMI. Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, 2018, ⟨10.1007/s12350-018-01493-y⟩. ⟨hal-01926769⟩
57 View
0 Download

Altmetric

Share

Gmail Mastodon Facebook X LinkedIn More