Creatinine- versus cystatine C-based equations in assessing the renal function of candidates for liver transplantation with cirrhosis - Archive ouverte HAL Access content directly
Journal Articles Hepatology Year : 2014

Creatinine- versus cystatine C-based equations in assessing the renal function of candidates for liver transplantation with cirrhosis

V. de Souza
  • Function : Author
A. Hadj-Aissa
  • Function : Author
O. Dolomanova
  • Function : Author
Muriel Rabilloud
N. Rognant
  • Function : Author
S. Radenne
  • Function : Author
J. Dumortier
  • Function : Author
C. Chapuis-Cellier
  • Function : Author
F. Beyerle
  • Function : Author
C. Bon
  • Function : Author
J. Iwaz
  • Function : Author
L. Selistre
  • Function : Author
L. Dubourg
  • Function : Author

Abstract

Renal dysfunction is frequent in liver cirrhosis and is a strong prognostic predictor of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) outcome. Therefore, an accurate evaluation of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is crucial in pre-OLT patients. However, in these patients plasma creatinine (Pcr) is inaccurate and the place of serum cystatine C (CystC) is still debated. New GFR-predicting equations, based on standardized assays of Pcr and/or CystC, have been recently recommended in the general population but their performance in cirrhosis patients has been rarely studied. We evaluated the performance of the recently published Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equations (CKD-EPI-Pcr, CKD-EPI-CystC, and CKD-EPI-Pcr-CystC) and the more classical ones (4- and 6-variable MDRD and Hoek formulas) in cirrhosis patients referred for renal evaluation before OLT. Inulin clearance was performed in 202 consecutive patients together with the determination of Pcr and CystC with assays traceable to primary reference materials. The performance of the GFR-predicting equations was evaluated according to ascites severity (no, moderate, or refractory) and to hepatic and renal dysfunctions (MELD score \textless/= or \textgreater15 and KDOQI stages, respectively). In the whole population, CystC-based equations showed a better performance than Pcr-based ones (lower bias and higher 10% and 30% accuracies). CKD-EPI-CystC equation showed the best performance whatever the ascites severity and in presence of a significant renal dysfunction (GFR \textless60 mL/min/1.73 m(2)). CONCLUSION: Pcr-based GFR predicting equations are not reliable in pre-OLT patients even when an IDMS-traceable enzymatic Pcr assay is used. Whenever a CystC-assay traceable to primary reference materials is performed and when a true measurement of GFR is not possible, CystC-based equations, especially CKD-EPI-CystC, may be recommended to evaluate renal function and for KDOQI staging.
No file

Dates and versions

hal-01859023 , version 1 (21-08-2018)

Identifiers

Cite

V. de Souza, A. Hadj-Aissa, O. Dolomanova, Muriel Rabilloud, N. Rognant, et al.. Creatinine- versus cystatine C-based equations in assessing the renal function of candidates for liver transplantation with cirrhosis. Hepatology, 2014, 59 (4), pp.1522-31. ⟨10.1002/hep.26886⟩. ⟨hal-01859023⟩
33 View
0 Download

Altmetric

Share

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More