How Best to Disagree in Order to Agree? - Archive ouverte HAL
Article Dans Une Revue International Game Theory Review Année : 2016

How Best to Disagree in Order to Agree?

Emily Tanimura
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 941662
  • IdRef : 177856564
Sylvie Thoron
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 854074

Résumé

We propose a new non-cooperative approach to implement a cooperative bargaining solution. This approach relies on a mechanism which specifies what happens when, at the end of the bargaining phase, players' propositions are still not compatible. The mechanism uses a random lottery and the history of proposals. At equilibrium, under the threat of this mechanism, provided that the use of it carries a small cost, players reach consensus after a finite number of proposals. No discounting is needed. The equilibrium strategies implement the full Raiffa bargaining process and players agree on a solution arbitrarily close to the Raiffa solution.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
IGTR.pdf (369.03 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)
Loading...

Dates et versions

hal-01704885 , version 1 (08-02-2018)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : hal-01704885 , version 1

Citer

Emily Tanimura, Sylvie Thoron. How Best to Disagree in Order to Agree?. International Game Theory Review, 2016. ⟨hal-01704885⟩
70 Consultations
121 Téléchargements

Partager

More