Article Dans Une Revue Ergonomics Année : 2017

Measuring mental workload with the NASA-TLX needs to examine each dimension rather than relying on the global score: An example with driving

Résumé

The distinction between several components of mental workload is often made in the ergonomics literature. However, measurements used are often established from a global score, notably with several questionnaires that originally reflect several dimensions. The present study tested the effect of driving situation complexity, experience and subjective levels of tension and alertness on each dimension of the NASA-TLX questionnaire of workload, in order to highlight the potential influence of intrinsic, extraneous and germane load factors. The results showed that, in complex situation, mental, temporal and physical demand (load dimensions) increased, and that novice drivers presented high physical demand when subjective tension was low and low own performance. Moreover, increase of mental and physical demand increased effort. It thus appears essential to distinguish the different components of mental workload used in the NASA-TLX questionnaire

Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
doc00027455.pdf (260.86 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)
Licence
Loading...

Dates et versions

hal-01575996 , version 1 (22-08-2017)

Licence

Identifiants

Citer

Edith Galy, Julie Paxion, Catherine Berthelon. Measuring mental workload with the NASA-TLX needs to examine each dimension rather than relying on the global score: An example with driving. Ergonomics, 2017, ⟨10.1080/00140139.2017.1369583⟩. ⟨hal-01575996⟩
514 Consultations
3299 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

  • More