“Chaque vin a sa lie." versus “Toute nuit a un jour." --- does the difference in the human processing of " chaque" and " tout" match the difference between the proof rules for conjunction and quantification? - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Communication Dans Un Congrès Année : 2015

“Chaque vin a sa lie." versus “Toute nuit a un jour." --- does the difference in the human processing of " chaque" and " tout" match the difference between the proof rules for conjunction and quantification?

Alda Mari

Résumé

This paper claims that the difference between the way French native speakers use the two universal quantifiers "tout" and "chaque" corresponds rather well to the proof theoretical difference between 1) proving P(a i) for each element a i in the domain and conjoining them and 2) proving P(x) for a generic element x. Experiments have been designed (but not yet realized) in order to support this claim.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
IncoherencesMariRetore.pdf (137.24 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)
Loading...

Dates et versions

hal-01341007 , version 1 (03-07-2016)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : hal-01341007 , version 1

Citer

Alda Mari, Christian Retoré. “Chaque vin a sa lie." versus “Toute nuit a un jour." --- does the difference in the human processing of " chaque" and " tout" match the difference between the proof rules for conjunction and quantification?. (In)Coherence of discourse, M. Amblard; M. Musiol; M. Rebuschi, Dec 2015, Nancy, France. ⟨hal-01341007⟩
236 Consultations
103 Téléchargements

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More