Rationalisation of Profiles of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Communication Dans Un Congrès Année : 2016

Rationalisation of Profiles of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks

Résumé

Different agents may have different points of view. This can be modelled using different abstract argumentation frameworks , each consisting of a set of arguments and a binary attack-relation between them. A question arising in this context is whether the diversity of views observed in such a profile of argumentation frameworks is consistent with the assumption that every individual argumentation framework is induced by a combination of, first, some basic factual attack-relation between the arguments and, second, the personal preferences of the agent concerned. We treat this question of rationalisability of a profile as an algorithmic problem and identify tractable and intractable cases. This is useful for understanding what types of profiles can reasonably be expected to come up in a multiagent system.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
fp348-airiau.pdf (280.3 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Fichiers éditeurs autorisés sur une archive ouverte
Loading...

Dates et versions

hal-01277428 , version 1 (22-02-2016)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : hal-01277428 , version 1

Citer

Stéphane Airiau, Elise Bonzon, Ulle Endriss, Nicolas Maudet, Julien Rossit. Rationalisation of Profiles of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks. AAMAS 2016, May 2016, Singapore, Singapore. ⟨hal-01277428⟩
178 Consultations
146 Téléchargements

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More