A Comparative Study of Ranking-based Semantics for Abstract Argumentation - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Communication Dans Un Congrès Année : 2016

A Comparative Study of Ranking-based Semantics for Abstract Argumentation

Résumé

Argumentation is a process of evaluating and comparing a set of arguments. A way to compare them consists in using a ranking-based semantics which rank-order arguments from the most to the least acceptable ones. Recently, a number of such semantics have been proposed independently, often associated with some desirable properties. However, there is no comparative study which takes a broader perspective. This is what we propose in this work. We provide a general comparison of all these semantics with respect to the proposed properties. That allows to underline the differences of behavior between the existing semantics.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
BDKMAAAI16.pdf (264.77 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Fichiers éditeurs autorisés sur une archive ouverte
Loading...

Dates et versions

hal-01263996 , version 1 (29-01-2016)

Identifiants

Citer

Elise Bonzon, Jérôme Delobelle, Sébastien Konieczny, Nicolas Maudet. A Comparative Study of Ranking-based Semantics for Abstract Argumentation. 30th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-2016), Feb 2016, Phoenix, United States. ⟨hal-01263996⟩
197 Consultations
165 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More