With the help of two texts somewhat longer than their abbreviated Baroccianus’
counterparts, Malalas’ evaluation of Justinian’s reign may acquire a richer significance: at a
moment (ca. 565) in which questions arose about the way this very special emperor was to
be recorded, Malalas (or at least a loyal continuator) did not develop a long justification, but
suggested an image coherent with the previous edition. The tale does not deny that Justinian
was at times an excessively hard persecutor. But it underlines his faculty to rule as a Christian
model when he used fear as a political tool, gave relief, forgave, or showed his moderation
when judging the conjuration of 562. Among these significant features, his capacity to repent is
highlighted: his acceptance of penance accredits his role as the most pious emperor.