Ranking-based semantics for argumentation frameworks - Archive ouverte HAL Access content directly
Conference Papers Year : 2013

Ranking-based semantics for argumentation frameworks

Abstract

An argumentation system consists of a set of interacting arguments and a semantics for evaluating them. This paper proposes a new family of semantics which rank-orders arguments from the most acceptable to the weakest one(s). The new semantics enjoy two other main features: i) an attack weakens its target but does not kill it, ii) the number of attackers has a great impact on the acceptability of an argument.We start by proposing a set of rational postulates that such semantics could satisfy, then construct various semantics that enjoy them.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
amgoud_12512.pdf (253.26 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origin Files produced by the author(s)
Loading...

Dates and versions

hal-01239719 , version 1 (09-12-2015)

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : hal-01239719 , version 1
  • OATAO : 12512

Cite

Leila Amgoud, Jonathan Ben-Naim. Ranking-based semantics for argumentation frameworks. 7th International Conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management (SUM 2013), Sep 2013, Washington, DC, United States. pp.134-147. ⟨hal-01239719⟩
92 View
247 Download

Share

Gmail Mastodon Facebook X LinkedIn More