The Weakest Failure Detector for Eventual Consistency - Archive ouverte HAL Access content directly
Conference Papers Year : 2015

The Weakest Failure Detector for Eventual Consistency


In its classical form, a consistent replicated service requires all replicas to witness the same evolution of the service state. Assuming a message-passing environment with a majority of correct processes, the necessary and sufficient information about failures for implementing a general state machine replication scheme ensuring consistency is captured by the Ω failure detector. This paper shows that in such a message-passing environment, Ω is also the weakest failure detector to implement an eventually consistent replicated service, where replicas are expected to agree on the evolution of the service state only after some (a priori unknown) time. In fact, we show that Ω is the weakest to implement eventual consistency in any message-passing environment, i.e., under any assumption on when and where failures might occur. Ensuring (strong) consistency in any environment requires, in addition to Ω, the quorum failure detector ∑. Our paper thus captures, for the first time, an exact computational difference between building a replicated state machine that ensures consistency and one that only ensures eventual consistency.

Dates and versions

hal-01213330 , version 1 (08-10-2015)



Swan Dubois, Rachid Guerraoui, Petr Kuznetsov, Franck Petit, Pierre Sens. The Weakest Failure Detector for Eventual Consistency. 34th Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC-2015), Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain, Jul 2015, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain. pp.375-384, ⟨10.1145/2767386.2767404⟩. ⟨hal-01213330⟩
170 View
0 Download



Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More