Should Terminology Principles be re-examined? - Archive ouverte HAL
Communication Dans Un Congrès Année : 2012

Should Terminology Principles be re-examined?

Résumé

Operationalization of terminology for IT applications has revived the Wüsterian approach. The conceptual dimension once more prevails after taking back seat to specialised lexicography. This is demonstrated by the emergence of ontology in terminology. While the Terminology Principles as defined in Felber's manual and the ISO standards remain at the core of traditional terminology , their computational implementation raises some issues. In this article, while reiterating their importance, we will be re-examining these Principles from a dual perspective: that of logic in the mathematical sense of the term and that of epistemology as in the theory of knowledge. We will thus be clarifying and describing some of them so as to take into account advances in knowledge engineering (ontology) and formal systems (logic). The notion of ontoterminology, terminology whose conceptual system is a formal ontology, results from this approach.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
Roche Paper 02 pp17-32.pdf (665.47 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)
Loading...

Dates et versions

hal-01180279 , version 1 (24-07-2015)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : hal-01180279 , version 1

Citer

Christophe Roche. Should Terminology Principles be re-examined?. New frontiers in the constructive symbiosis of terminology and knowledge engineering, Terminology and Knowledge Engineering Conference (TKE), Jun 2012, Madrid, Spain. p. 17-32. ⟨hal-01180279⟩
139 Consultations
320 Téléchargements

Partager

More