Addendum and corrigendum to my paper - "One more proof of Siegel's theorem"
Résumé
In the original paper we noticed a problem with the assertion $L(1,\chi_1)\neq0$ in Lemma 3 of Section 1. The problem is cleared up here. The assertions of the paper all remain valid.
Domaines
Mathématiques [math]| Origine | Accord explicite pour ce dépôt |
|---|