Naturalistic decision making and emotion in refereeing: affect at the heart of judgment - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Communication Dans Un Congrès Année : 2013

Naturalistic decision making and emotion in refereeing: affect at the heart of judgment

M Grimonprez
  • Fonction : Auteur

Résumé

Introduction: This study examines emotions in decision making during sport refereeing. We study how emotions contribute to referees’ judgment acts. We seek to determine whether 1) a negative affect arises from the referees’ relationship to the unfolding game; 2) judgment acts are able to end this unsatisfactory situation. Method: We have investigated four games in a professional rugby championship. The game was filmed from the stands, the referee was equipped with a head-mounted camera, and a self-confrontation interview was realized. We analyzed the situations in which the referees reported negative affect. Results/discussion: In some cases, affective dissatisfaction was related to an abnormal situation. The referee showed what was abnormal and overcame his dissatisfaction through a judgment act. In other cases, affective dissatisfaction was related to a paradoxical situation. The return to a satisfactory state occurred when a norm became predominant to determine the normality/abnormality of the situation within its unfolding.
Fichier non déposé

Dates et versions

hal-01079925 , version 1 (04-11-2014)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : hal-01079925 , version 1

Citer

Géraldine Rix-Lièvre, Simon Boyer, Michel Récopé, M Grimonprez. Naturalistic decision making and emotion in refereeing: affect at the heart of judgment. 11th International Conference on Naturalistic Decision Making, 2013, Marseille, France. pp.83-86. ⟨hal-01079925⟩
140 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More