Multicentre comparison of the Glasgow Blatchford and Rockall scores in the prediction of clinical end-points after upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics Année : 2011

Multicentre comparison of the Glasgow Blatchford and Rockall scores in the prediction of clinical end-points after upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage.

Adrian J Stanley
  • Fonction : Auteur correspondant
  • PersonId : 916652

Connectez-vous pour contacter l'auteur
Harry R Dalton
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 916653
Oliver Blatchford
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 916654
Dawn Ashley
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 916655
Craig Mowat
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 916656
Aidan Cahill
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 916657
Daniel R Gaya
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 916658
Emma Thompson
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 916659
Usama Warshow
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 916660
Nikki Hare
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 916661
Max Groome
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 916662
George Benson
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 916663
William Murray
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 916664

Résumé

Background: The Glasgow Blatchford Score (GBS) is increasingly being used to predict intervention and outcome following upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage (UGIH). Aims: To compare the GBS with both the admission and full Rockall scores in predicting specific clinical end-points following UGIH. Patients and methods: Data on consecutive patients presenting to four UK hospitals were collected. Admission history, clinical and laboratory data, endoscopic findings, treatment and clinical follow-up were recorded. Using ROC curves, we compared the three scores in the prediction of death, endoscopic or surgical intervention, and transfusion. Results: 1555 patients (mean age 56.7 years) presented with UGIH during the study period. 74 (4.8%) died, 223 (14.3%) had endoscopic or surgical intervention and 363 (23.3%) required transfusion. The GBS was similar at predicting death compared with both the admission Rockall (area under ROC curve 0.804 vs 0.801) and full Rockall score (AUROC 0.741 vs 0.790). In predicting endo-surgical intervention, the GBS was superior to the admission Rockall (AUROC 0.858 vs 0.705; p<0.00005) and similar to the full Rockall score (AUROC 0.822 vs 0.797). The GBS was superior to both admission Rockall (AUROC 0.944 vs 0.756; p<0.00005) and full Rockall scores (AUROC 0.935 vs 0.792; p<0.00005) in predicting need for transfusion. Conclusions: Despite not incorporating age, the GBS is as effective as the admission and full Rockall scores in predicting death after UGIH. It is superior to both the admission and full Rockall scores in predicting need for transfusion and superior to the admission Rockall score in predicting endoscopic or surgical intervention.

Mots clés

Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
PEER_stage2_10.1111%2Fj.1365-2036.2011.04747.x.pdf (248.3 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)

Dates et versions

hal-00655064 , version 1 (26-12-2011)

Identifiants

Citer

Adrian J Stanley, Harry R Dalton, Oliver Blatchford, Dawn Ashley, Craig Mowat, et al.. Multicentre comparison of the Glasgow Blatchford and Rockall scores in the prediction of clinical end-points after upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage.. Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2011, 34 (4), pp.470. ⟨10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04747.x⟩. ⟨hal-00655064⟩

Collections

PEER
79 Consultations
191 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More