Can 3D synthesized views be reliably assessed through usual subjective and objective evaluation protocols? - Archive ouverte HAL
Communication Dans Un Congrès Année : 2011

Can 3D synthesized views be reliably assessed through usual subjective and objective evaluation protocols?

Résumé

This paper addresses the problem of evaluating virtual view synthesized images in the multi-view video context. As a matter of fact, view synthesis brings new types of distortion. The question refers to the ability of the traditional used objective metrics to assess synthesized views quality, considering the new types of artifacts. The experiments conducted to determine their reliability consist in assessing seven different view synthesis algorithms. Subjective and objective measurements have been performed. Results show that the most commonly used objective metrics can be far from human judgment depending on the artifact to deal with.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
bosc.pdf (932.45 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)
Loading...

Dates et versions

hal-00628066 , version 1 (30-09-2011)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : hal-00628066 , version 1

Citer

Emilie Bosc, Martin Köppel, Romuald Pépion, Muriel Pressigout, Luce Morin, et al.. Can 3D synthesized views be reliably assessed through usual subjective and objective evaluation protocols?. International Conference on Image Processing, Sep 2011, Brussels, Belgium. pp.2597-2600. ⟨hal-00628066⟩
647 Consultations
264 Téléchargements

Partager

More