AIM: Without precise international recommendations, despite the advances of the ISUAA study, the superiority of microsurgery or endovascular treatment for unruptured intracranial aneurysm (UIA) over the natural history of this disease has not been proved. In this context, the authors evaluate their experience with the aim of assessing the results and risks of the different therapeutics and comparing them with the natural risk of this disease. MATERIAL AND METHOD: From January 1993 to July 2000, 79 patients harboring 110 UIAs were treated. These patients were divided retrospectively into two groups. Group A included 45 operated patients. Group B included 37 patients treated with endovascular coiling. The therapeutic choice was not randomized and was approved by a multidisciplinary neurovascular staff. RESULTS: The two populations were homogeneous in terms of age and sex. In group A, 12 patients presented early complications (26.6 %), with one death. In group B, 15.6 % of the patients presented an ischemic complication. After 1 year of follow-up, morbidity was 11.4 % in group A and 4.8 % for group B. Angiography found a partial recanalization in 12.5 % of the operated patients and in 33 % of the patients treated with endovascular coiling. DISCUSSION: Many factors are involved in the therapeutic decision: UIA location and size and individual risks. Progress in both surgery and interventional neuroradiology has led to good results conforming with the data reported in the literature but does not demonstrate the superiority of one technique over another.